|
|
| Catalog Number |
5959812 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip (x2) on (b)(6) 2009 and (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip (x2) on (b)(6) 2009 and (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of sepramesh ip (device 1).Per op notes, ¿a large hernia sac was noted and contained omentum was reduced.The sac was excised.A sepramesh ip (device 1) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia with pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with excision of sepramesh ip (device 1) and implant of sepramesh ip (device 2).Per op notes, ¿omental and small bowel adhesions were lysed.All the adhesions of abdominal wall were taken down.The prior mesh (device 1) was noted pulled away from the abdominal wall and was excised entirely.The hernia sac was noted and reduced.A sepramesh ip (device 2) was placed and tacked using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|