• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5959812
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip (x2) on (b)(6) 2009 and (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip (x2) on (b)(6) 2009 and (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of sepramesh ip (device 1).Per op notes, ¿a large hernia sac was noted and contained omentum was reduced.The sac was excised.A sepramesh ip (device 1) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia with pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with excision of sepramesh ip (device 1) and implant of sepramesh ip (device 2).Per op notes, ¿omental and small bowel adhesions were lysed.All the adhesions of abdominal wall were taken down.The prior mesh (device 1) was noted pulled away from the abdominal wall and was excised entirely.The hernia sac was noted and reduced.A sepramesh ip (device 2) was placed and tacked using sutures.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEPRAMESH IP
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10747502
Report Number1213643-2020-09693
Device Sequence Number3345878
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031830
UDI-Public(01)00801741031830(17)111228(10)HUTL0260
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateRI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063739
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2010
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/28/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/28/2011
Device Catalogue Number5959812
Device Lot NumberHUTL0260
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/19/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/28/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Disability;
Patient SexMale
-
-