| Model Number |
PED-500-25 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/26/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received a report that the microcatheter was delivered to the m2 segment, and the pipeline was delivered.An attempt was made to open the stent at the m1 section, but the distal tip could not be opened when the microcatheter was retrieved 10 mm.More than two attempts were made, the whole set up was retrieved to the internal carotid artery, but the tip still could not be opened.It was noted less than 50% of the stent had been deployed, and no additional steps were taken in an attempt to open the stent.After this, the entire set up was withdrawn, and a new microcatheter and stent was used to complete the surgery with no reported issues.It was indicated that all devices were prepared as per the instructions for use (ifu), and no patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured aneurysm of the left communicating artery segment with a max diameter of 14 mm and a 8 mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was severe.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (dapt) was administered, but the platelet reactivity units (pru) level was unknown.The catheter used was a phenom 27.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3: analysis of the pipeline flex embolization device (lot no.A997329) found that the distal and proximal dps restraints were intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube and ptfe shrink tubing were found to be intact with no signs of elongation.The distal and proximal ends of the pipeline flex braid were fully opened and moderately frayed.No bend found on the pusher.No damages were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker or with the proximal bumper.No other anomalies were observed.Based on the returned device, the pipeline flex was not confirmed to have failure to open at the distal end as the distal and proximal ends of pipeline flex braid were fully opened and moderately frayed.The damage to the braid on the ends of the pipeline flex braid is likely the results of the physician re-sheathing the device more than recommended two times.It is likely that the severe vessel tortuosity may have contributed to the failure to open issue.There was no non-conformance to specifi cations identified that led to the failure to open issue.Per our instructions for use (ifu): ¿begin to deliver the device using a combination of unsheathing the pipeline flex embolization device and pushing delivery wire simultaneously.After the distal end of the pipeline flex embolization device has successfully expanded, deploy the remainder of pipeline flex embolization device by pushing the delivery wire and/or unsheathing the pipeline flex embolization device.Resheathing and/or manipulation of the micro catheter, by locking down the delivery wire and moving both as a system, may facilitate expansion of the pipeline flex embolization device.The system is designed to allow for 2 full cycles of re-sheathing of the pipeline flex embolization device.Re-sheathing the pipeline flex embolization device more than 2 full cycles may cause damage to the distal or proximal ends of the braid.Do not use in patients in whom the angiography demonstrates the anatomy is not appropriate for endovascular treatment, due to conditions such as severe intracranial vessel tortuosity or stenosis.¿ h6: method code updated to b01.Result code updated to c070601.Conclusion code updated to d1103.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information received.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|