• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - COMPOSIX L/P; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - COMPOSIX L/P; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0134810
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
Date of Event 11/12/2010
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix kugel (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009 and composix kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009 and composix kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p (device #1).Per op notes, ¿the hernia defect was identified and reduced.The adhesions were taken down.A composix l/p (device #1) was placed and tacked.¿ on (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of composix l/p (device #1) and implant of composix kugel mesh (device #2).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified and excised.The small bowel was reduced.Adhesions were lysed.The old mesh (device #1) was pulled away from the abdomen was excised entirely.A composix kugel mesh (device #2) was placed using prolene sutures.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol -composix l/p (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - composix kugel mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH - COMPOSIX L/P
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10754296
Report Number1213643-2020-09874
Device Sequence Number13734631
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031311
UDI-Public(01)00801741031311(17)130128(10)HURL0244
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K061754
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2010
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/07/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2013
Device Catalogue Number0134810
Device Lot NumberHURL0244
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/27/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/17/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/29/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/07/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2007
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-