|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix kugel (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009 and composix kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p (device #1).Per op notes, ¿the hernia defect was identified and reduced.The adhesions were taken down.A composix l/p (device #1) was placed and tacked.¿ on (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of composix l/p (device #1) and implant of composix kugel mesh (device #2).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified and excised.The small bowel was reduced.Adhesions were lysed.The old mesh (device #1) was pulled away from the abdomen was excised entirely.A composix kugel mesh (device #2) was placed using prolene sutures.¿.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol -composix l/p (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - composix kugel mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|