|
On an unknown date around in 2008, the patient underwent endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses.On an unknown date after the procedure, the aneurysm enlargement was confirmed.The cause of the aneurysm enlargement was unknown.Type ii or type ia or type iii endoleak were not denied but not confirmed from the ct images.Palmaz stent xl was found a lack of apposition at the proximal neck due to the proximal neck enlargement.Reported the open procedure is planning.
|
|
H6: code 4627 - added, as fda coding changed since the original medwatch was submitted.H6: code 10 - added with results of device evaluation.H6: code 213 - the review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.H6: code 67 - added with results of device evaluation.The device fragment was returned to w.L.Gore & associates for investigation.Submitted unfixed was a gore excluder aaa endoprosthesis trunk fragment.The device fragment had been transected prior to arrival at w.L.Gore & associates.The abluminal surface had scattered plaques of friable red/brown tissue present.The lumen was generally devoid of tissue and patent.A histopathological examination of the tissue could not be performed, due to the lack of proper fixation prior to arrival at w.L.Gore & associates.The device fragment was subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.Following digestion, the device fragment was examined for material disruptions with the aid of a stereomicroscope.The fragment was circumferentially transected at the proximal aspect and at the distal ipsilateral leg aspect.A longitudinal transection was present, extending from the proximal edge to the ipsilateral leg distal edge.Three holes were present on the device fragment; the holes were in line with and extending from an area of disruption at the transected edge.The holes and material disruptions identified were consistent with those caused by interaction with sharp surgical instruments (i.E., scalpel/scissors), grasping/pulling with surgical instruments (i.E., forceps/clamps), and/or manipulation of transected wire ends interacting with the graft material, likely caused during the explant procedure.No wear related disruptions were identified.Disruptions identified were not associated with handling or manufacturing process at w.L.Gore & associates.The disruptions are consistent with a surgical procedure.
|