• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 ONFLEX; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 ONFLEX; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0115410
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Nerve Damage (1979); Injury (2348)
Date of Event 06/23/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol onflex (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard onflex mesh medium on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents onflex (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent bard flat mesh (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard onflex mesh medium on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of onflex (device #2).Per op notes, "no direct hernia defect was identified.The internal inguinal ring was slightly enlarged.The inguinal canal floor was reconstructed with onflex (device #2).Note, there was no mention of bard flat mesh (device #1) being implanted in this procedure.(note: there was no indication in the medical records provided that the patient was implanted with a bard flat mesh.) (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with chronic pain, right inguinal neuralgia with meshoma, nerve entrapment thereby underwent with removal of partial mesh (device #1).Per op notes, "there was old mesh in the right inguinal space.Significant amount of adhesions around the mesh were noted.The mesh (device #2) was removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONFLEX
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10779601
Report Number1213643-2020-09929
Device Sequence Number19799568
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741074424
UDI-Public(01)00801741074424(17)180628(10)HUZF0011
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142711
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2018
Device Catalogue Number0115410
Device Lot NumberHUZF0011
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/28/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/21/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/03/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/06/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Disability; Required Intervention;
Patient Age38 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight105 KG
-
-