• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LEGION CR OXIN FEM SZ3 RT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LEGION CR OXIN FEM SZ3 RT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71421223
Device Problem Expiration Date Error (2528)
Patient Problems No Patient Involvement (2645); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/12/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the expiration date of the legion cr oxin fem sz3 rt is showing 2016, the year of manufacture, while it actually is 2026.No case involved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device could not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was returned without its original packaging.A review of the attached picture and device history record confirmed the device was manufactured in 2016 and has a 2016 sterilization expiration date on the device label.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated as the packaging label did not have the correct expiration date.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but not limited system data input incorrect.The quality team found this complaint to be an isolated event and did not have an impact on the patient's safety.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device could not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was returned without its original packaging.A review of the attached picture and device history record confirmed the device was manufactured in 2016 and has a 2016 sterilization expiration date on the device label.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated as the packaging label did not have the correct expiration date.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but not limited system data input incorrect.The quality team found this complaint to be an isolated event and did not have an impact on the patient's safety.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEGION CR OXIN FEM SZ3 RT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key10780308
MDR Text Key214413286
Report Number1020279-2020-06079
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556029718
UDI-Public00885556029718
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K043440
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/23/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number71421223
Device Catalogue Number71421223
Device Lot Number16FM19333G
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/12/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/03/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/21/2022
03/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/23/2022
03/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-