As reported, prior to patient contact during an unknown procedure, the side port of a flexor ansel guiding sheath separated from the device.The device was not used.Additional information has been requested, but is unavailable at this time.
|
H6: ec methods code desc - 5: communication/interviews (4111) description of event: as reported, prior to patient contact during an unknown procedure, the side port of a flexor ansel guiding sheath separated from the device.The device was not used.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.The complainant returned one sheath and stopcock to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed: one prior to use kcfw was received.Inspection found that one of the leur lock ports (stem) of the stop cock was broken off.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied: ¿supplied sterilized by ethylene oxide gas in peel-open packages.Intended for one-time use.Sterile if package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use the product if there is doubt as to whether the product is sterile.Store in a dark, dry, cool place.Avoid extended exposure to light.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ supplier investigation the investigation found that the affected component is supplied to cook from an external supplier.Cook requested that the supplier investigate this occurrence.The supplier reviewed their quality records and confirmed that all parts passed visual and dimensional criteria during inspection, and that there were no manufacturing notes of anything related to this issue.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.Cook has concluded a component failure without manufacturing or design deficiency contributed to this incident.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|