Product complaint #: (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or manufacturing record evaluation, was not possible as the required lot number was not provided.The information received will be retained for trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.(b)(4).
|
Operative notes were received and indicated that patient previously underwent a first left hip revision on an unknown date in 2016.During this time, the metal femoral head and poly acetabular liner were revised to a ceramic femoral head and new poly acetabular liner due to metallosis.The operative note from (b)(6) 2020 was reviewed.Within the note, the surgeon indicated the patient previously underwent a first left hip revision on an unknown date in 2016.During the first revision, the metal femoral head and poly acetabular liner were revised to a ceramic femoral head and new poly acetabular liner.The first revision was due to metallosis.There is no additional information regarding the first revision nor first revision operative notes available at the time of review.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a second left hip revision due to pain, instability, stiffness, arthrofibrosis, metallosis, inflammation, edema, difficulty walking, limb asymmetry, and a loose and migrated femoral stem.The surgeon also noted placing a constrained liner due to multiple dislocations following the first revision.There is no evidence of prior treatment for the dislocations.The cup was retained during the revision.Doi: (b)(6) 2008, dor: 2016 head and liner only, affected side: left hip.
|