• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH ¿ DULEX; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH ¿ DULEX; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0175101
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
Date of Event 04/11/2014
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ dulex (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent bard/davol mesh ¿ ventralex (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol dulex on (b)(6) 2013 and ventralex hernia patch on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4, d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol mesh - dulex (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh - ventralex (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol dulex on (b)(6) 2013 and ventralex hernia patch on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with large ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of dulex mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, "two hernias notes, one slightly superior and another slightly superior to right.A bard dulex mesh (device #1) was placed and sutured." (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia and adhesions thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh (device #1) and implant of ventralex mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, "the old mesh (device #1) has migrated inferiorly, this was removed.A ventralex mesh (device #2) was placed and sutured.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH ¿ DULEX
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BRIDGER BIOMED, INC. -3031159
2430 north 7th avenue
bozeman MT 59715
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10814490
Report Number1213643-2020-10132
Device Sequence Number4123470
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741011931
UDI-Public(01)00801741011931(17)180628(10)BRXF0008
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K003917
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2014
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2018
Device Catalogue Number0175101
Device Lot NumberBRXF0008
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/05/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/09/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight71 KG
-
-