|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the second complaint reported for this lot number.The device history records were reviewed and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for these reports.Investigation summary: one tri-funnel replacement gastrostomy tube 22f was returned for evaluation and one electronic video was provided for review.Visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported fluid leak and material hole as a leak was noted 1.4cm from the medication port opening upon infusion and the provided video also confirms the leak issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 05/2023),g3,h6(device) h11: h6(method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|