| Model Number |
283609 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Not Applicable (3189)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The lot number was unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during a knee arthroscopy procedure on an unknown date, it was observed that the shaver system device had metal abrasions.There were fragments generated that remained inside the patient's knee joint.There was a ten minute delay in the procedure.The procedure was not completed successfully.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi:(b)(4).Incomplete the lot number is unknown at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary = according to the information received, it was reported that during knee arthroscopy metal abrasion.Hospital has no more trust in us and will search another supplier for fms.The complaint device was received and evaluated.The inner and outer sleeves were separated and inspected for any visual defects that may contribute to the complaint condition.The device had signs of friction and striation marks on the surface of the distal end of the inner blade.Based on device condition received, this complaint can be confirmed.Given that lot number was not provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.The possible root cause for reported failure can be attributed to blade wear and degradation, as per ifu; excessive side loading may result in blade wear and degradation.Adequate suction is recommended to reduce wear and degradation of the device.Besides, a hand piece used in this procedure where the blade is assembled was not received for evaluation, potential ways to reduce shedding is to ensure all hand pieces are properly serviced and maintained to assure the presence of the o-ring since the lack/damaged o-ring can contribute to shedding issue.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|