|
It was reported one day post feeding devices placement, the tube allegedly cracked.No problems were found with the product at the time of the implantation procedure.And after insertion, a crack in the tube was found in the stage for injecting fluid food into the patient.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the first complaint reported for this product/lot number combination.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: one ponsky peg tube w/ dilating tip, one insertion wire, one fenestrated drape, one scalpel, one luer lock syringe, one needle (25mm), one introducer needle (86mm), six gauze pads, one dual port feeding adaptor, one curved hemostat, one needle (38mm), one external linear bolster, and one external star bolster were returned for evaluation and two electronic photos were provided for review.Gross visual and functional evaluation were performed.Although the lot sample was returned for review, two electronic photos were provided for review.The reported issue cannot be confirmed as the catheter was wrapped up with a clear plastic tape like material.Partial view of the catheter was seen on the provided photo.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported partial break of tube as the original device was not returned for the evaluation and the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event are unknown and could not be concluded from the returned lot sample.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2024), g3.H11: h6 (device, method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
It was reported one day post feeding devices placement, the tube allegedly cracked.No problems were found with the product at the time of the implantation procedure.And after insertion, a crack in the tube was found in the stage for injecting fluid food into the patient.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|