• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US 5.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US 5.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 222209
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Not Applicable (3189); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/02/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by affiliate via complaint submission tool that two healix anchors broke at the tip while surgeon was trying to deploy it in a rotator cuff surgery.The procedure was completed with another device.No patient consequence.There was a delay of 15 minutes.Fragments were generated, removed successfully.The devices are available to be returned for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: additional information: event description(b5).
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received from the affiliate reported the surgeon was able to use the same bone hole to implant the second anchor.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary
=
> according to the information provided, it was reported by affiliate via complaint submission tool that two healix anchors broke at the tip while surgeon was trying to deploy it in a rotator cuff surgery.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the distal tip of the anchors was broken.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:2l82260, and no non-conformances were identified.The complaint reported was confirmed.The photo does not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be associated with off axis insertion or levering during insertion.This cannot be conclusive determined.  at this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it could be observed that the inserter shaft is not deformed or bent, the inserter tip is in good condition, no structural anomalies were found.The anchor is broken at the tip.The device has some spots of biological matter.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 2l82260 number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.A root cause for the broken anchor can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; axial misalignment or bending force was applied to the tip of the device.As per ifu: inserting the awl less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion, may result in anchor fracture.Do not apply a bending force to the inserter.This can damage the anchor or inserter tip.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
5.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD
Common Device Name
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT MITEK
chemin blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key10848121
Report Number1221934-2020-03502
Device Sequence Number19050285
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705007578
UDI-Public10886705007578
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
K150209
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/03/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date12/31/2021
Device Model Number222209
Device Catalogue Number222209
Device Lot Number2L82260
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/10/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/03/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/06/2020
02/04/2021
01/10/2022
01/14/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/16/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/07/2020
02/05/2021
01/11/2022
01/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-