|
Device evaluation no damage was noted to the catheter heating element/coil.Microscopic examination of the catheter pins revealed that all the pins were straight and attached.All pins were visually inspected to be straight.One kink was identified along the catheter shaft.The kinks were located approximately 32.2cm from the distal tip the catheter connector was plugged into the resistance tester to perform continuity and resistance functional test; the catheter was tested according to the test parameters, test methods and acceptance criteria as per gs20004583.Test 1.(e+/ e- test) (specification: 80 ohms to 113 ohms) ¿ result = 88.0 ohms test 2.(tc+/ tc- test) (specification: = 250 ohms) ¿ result = 0l ohms test 3.(resistor 1) (specification: 13.43 to 13.97 k ohms) result = 13.71 k ohms) test 4.(resistor 2) (specification: 7.90 k ohms to 8.22 k ohms) result = 8.06 k ohms) test 1 (tc+/ tc- test) failed.Tests 1, test 3, and test 4 passed and are inside the specification and acceptance criterion.The catheter was connected to both the rfg3 and rfg2 lab generator, the device did not complete the required cycle with an advisory message ¿the connection device is broken¿ check being seen on both generators.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|