|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Device evaluation: visual analysis of the returned device identified: underweight, broken shell and others and missing a piece of shell (0-25%).A microscopic analysis was performed which identified: one broken sharp on the anterior, three broken sharp on the posterior and one opening sharp on the posterior.A dimension measurement in the shell was performed which identify the thickness within specification.Based on the device analysis the final assessment is: one sharp broken on the anterior assessed as unidentified (tear) opening, three sharp broken on the posterior assessed as unidentified (tear) opening., one sharp opening on the posterior assessed as unidentified (tear) opening., missing shell due to inconclusive.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|