|
Manufacturer's view: kulzer has evaluated based on the given information that the device has caused the injuries due to a wrong application procedure and a lack of protection measures.Kulzer reports this incident out of caution to be compliant with 21cfr 803 and out of abundance of caution.Nevertheless, the product was applied by a dental hygienist.In the ifu the user is defined as "gluma desensitizer should only be used by a dentist".Obviously the dental hygienist was either not aware, not trained or did not take care of ifu for the correct use of the product.The ifu clearly recommends for the application of the product sufficient soft tissue protection, the use of a minimal amount of the product.Additionally, it clearly says: after application rinse off thoroughly after 30 to 60 s residence time with suction of the flush.If too much material is used or residues of the desensitizing chemicals in gluma desensitizer stay on the tooth and get in contact to mucosa, this will exactly lead to the described outcome.Unknown tablets were prescribed in connection with this incident.The patient did not come back to the dental clinic and kulzer does not have patient's contact data.Therefore, no update about the healing process could be verified.Nevertheless and according to kulzer's experience such minor injuries are self-healing and disappear usually 5 to 10 days after the burn's occurrence.
|