It was reported, during a ureteroscopy, a ncircle tipless stone extractor (reference this report) and a ngage nitinol stone extractor (reference patient identifier (b)(6)) were used.While extracting small stones from the kidney, the device quit working during the case.The device worked initially, then eventually quit working.The procedure was completed with another extractor.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.
|
Event summary it was reported, during a ureteroscopy, a ncircle tipless stone extractor (reference this report) and a ngage nitinol stone extractor (manufacturer report # 1820334-2020-02172) were used.While extracting small stones from the kidney, the device quit working during the case.The device worked initially, then eventually quit working.The procedure was completed with another extractor.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Investigation - evaluation.Reviews of the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.No device was returned for investigation.Accordingly, no physical examination was performed.Cook could not complete a review of the device history record (dhr) or search for other complaints from the product lot due to lack of lot information from the user facility.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.There were no identified gaps in the device manufacturing instructions or quality control procedures.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is packaged with instructions which caution, ¿enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder,¿ and, ¿do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that the most probable cause of the event could not be determined.There are multiple possible causes that could have affected the ability of the device to function properly during use.Two devices experiencing failure during use in the same procedure could indicate that there was a procedural issue that affected the devices, such as patient anatomy or the number of stones that needed to be retrieved.Details of the procedure are not known, so a determination of the cause of the issue could not be conclusively determined.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|