|
Reporter is a j&j sales representative.The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: part: 329.151 lot: 2343259 manufacturing site: bettlach release to warehouse date: march 31, 2008 a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Visual inspection: the locking calcaneal plate cutter (p/n 329.151 lot 2343259) was received at us customer quality (cq).Upon visual inspection it was noticed that the peg component was broken off from the device.The peg was not returned at uscq.No other issues were identified with the returned components of the device.Device failure/defect identified? yes dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection was not performed due to the confirmed post manufacturing damage and the broken component was not returned to measure the relevant feature of the peg.Document/specification review: the following design drawings were reviewed during this investigation.Locking calcaneal plate cutter assembly design drawing locking calcaneal plate cutter assembly design drawing conclusion: the complaint condition is confirmed for the locking calcaneal plate cutter (p/n 329.151 lot 2343259) as the peg component was broken off.During this investigation no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|