| Model Number |
254618 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/05/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further detaitlhse aprreo drueccte iuvpeodn awth iac hl attheirs dmaetdew aat cshu pipsl ebmaesnetda lh amse dbweaetnc hr ewcielilv ebde, sheonwte.Ver, the product evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during an unknown surgery on (b)(6) 2020, it was observed that the intrafix family tibial sheath inserter device was broken.All broken fragments were retrieved.It was not reported if there was a delay in the surgical procedure.It was not reported if a spare device was available for use.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : according to the information provided, it was reported that the item/instrument was broken during a case.All broken fragments were retrieved.Instrument was being used by surgeon very experienced with equipment.No further information known.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation confirmed that the distal tip was broken off.The device appears to be heavy used and is in worn condition, there are a lot of nicks and marks on it.The root cause for this failure can related to wear from heavy use and constant excessive force applied to the device during use.Other than this, a definitive root cause could not be determined as no lot/batch information was provided and reported information was limited.Given that no lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|