• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD BIOSYN; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC AC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD BIOSYN; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC AC Back to Search Results
Model Number GMJ-33-M
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/05/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic procedure, upon opening the suture packet, the thread had already become detached from the needle.After opening 4 packets from the same box, some thread and needle on all 4 packets were found to be detached.Therefore, 1 packet from another box (same lot) was opened.When opening that 1 packet, the thread and the needle had already detached.A new suture was used to resolve the issue and complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was not returned, but a photo was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted five needles and five sutures.A needle was detached from the suture.It was reported that the needle unexpectedly separated from the thread.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 correction: g1(all manufacturers information) h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.Fifteen devices and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection of the opened samples noted twenty five needles and twenty sutures.Nine of the needles were detached from any suture.All sutures were removed from the retainer.Microscopic inspection of all the needles noted proper crimp marks.Visual and tactile inspection of the sealed suture samples noted no abnormalities.The needles did not detach during handling of the suture or loading into the instron.Functional testing noted that a needle attachment was performed on the sealed samples and the results met specifications for the product.It was reported that the needle unexpectedly separated from the thread.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOSYN
Common Device Name
SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC AC
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR  0101
MDR Report Key10897903
Report Number9612501-2020-01765
Device Sequence Number1429134
Product Code GAM
UDI-Device Identifier10884521032835
UDI-Public10884521032835
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K000037
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/03/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2025
Device Model NumberGMJ-33-M
Device Catalogue NumberGMJ-33-M
Device Lot NumberD0C0998Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2021
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/05/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/22/2021
05/11/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/24/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/16/2021
06/03/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-