• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MASIMO CORPORATION PULSE OXIMETRY SENSOR; OXIMETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MASIMO CORPORATION PULSE OXIMETRY SENSOR; OXIMETER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems Hyperventilation (1910); High Oxygen Saturation (2478)
Event Date 11/22/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Patient appeared to be desaturating to the 70's per massimo forehead pulse oximetry sensor.Interventions immediately began to improve oxygenation.No improvement per pulse ox.Pulse ox was lined up with pupil, headband properly placed, full pleth and carat with no indication of inaccurate reading per massimo guidelines.New senor placed in the same position as the old sensor and resulting in a reading of 100% spo2.Arterial blood gas sent showing hyperventilation and hyper oxygenation as a result of interventions based on faulty original pulse ox reading.Fda safety report id # (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE OXIMETRY SENSOR
Type of Device
OXIMETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MASIMO CORPORATION
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key10919103
MDR Text Key218976980
Report NumberMW5098128
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQA
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/24/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/27/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age61 YR
-
-