|
(b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for analysis.A pusher wire, introducer sheath and coil were returned for this complaint.Visual inspection was performed and revealed that the twist lock of the introducer sheath had been opened.The introducer sheath was inspected and no anomalies was noted.The coil and pusher wire were returned stretched and kinked.The interlocking arms were inspected and it was detached from the rest of the coil and pusher wire.Microscopic inspection of the pusher wire was performed and revealed that the proximal end has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and it was detached from the rest of the pusher wire, in addition it was not returned.Microscopic inspection of the main coil and revealed that the proximal end has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and it was detached from the rest of the coil, in addition it was not returned.Dimensional inspection of the mid solder joint outer diameter (od), distal tfe od., and proximal tfe od were performed and were within specifications.Dimensional inspection of the main coil zap tip od and primary coil od were performed and were within specifications.However, dimensional inspection of the number of fiber bundles revealed fiber loss and does not meet specification.The fiber loss was due to the coil condition.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 16nov2020.It was reported that the coil was stuck in the catheter.A 10mmx50cm interlock coil was selected for use on the internal iliac artery.During the procedure, it was noted that the coil was stuck in the catheter distal part.The coil was removed with the catheter and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.No complications were reported and there was no patient injury.However, device analysis revealed an interlocking arm detached from the rest of the coil and pusher wire, and fiber loss.
|