Reported event: an event regarding a limb length discrepancy involving a jts distal femur, tibial component was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for jts distal femoral replacement which was inserted on (b)(6) 2015.The surgeon reported maximum extension of the implant and leg length discrepancy.The x-rays provided show that the implant has almost reached to its maximum extension of 50 mm, thus the implant has fulfilled its intended use and no further investigation is required.In addition, the affected leg is shorter than the opposite leg due to shortening of the tibial bone.Therefore, the radiographic review can confirm the clinical report and reason for revision.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate (b)(4) device was manufactured and accepted into final stock on 02 october 2015 with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.Device not returned.
|