| Model Number |
G43868 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/30/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.Pma/510(k) #: p050017 s002 and s003.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Upon post placement dilation, resistance was met when removing the balloon.The balloon was removed and a fractured portion of the stent came out with the balloon.The stent was left in place and the procedure was considered complete and successful patient outcome: did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no.Was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization? no.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no.Has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? na.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.Pma/510(k) #: p050017 s002 and s003.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Correction report being submitted as the device was returned to cirl and evaluated in the lab on 26-nov-2020, this was omitted from the previously submitted report in error.Upon post placement dilation, resistance was met when removing the balloon.The balloon was removed and a fractured portion of the stent came out with the balloon.The stent was left in place and the procedure was considered complete and successful patient outcome: did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no.Was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization? no.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no.Has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? na.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is a complete report.The investigation was completed on 26-mar-21 and the results and conclusions are outlined in section h of this report.Upon post placement dilation, resistance was met when removing the balloon.The balloon was removed and a fractured portion of the stent came out with the balloon.The stent was left in place and the procedure was considered complete and successful patient outcome: did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no.Was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization? no.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no.Has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? na.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma # p050017/s002 and s003.Annex g: g04113 - stent.Device evaluation.A section (approximately 2cms) of ziv6-35-80-10-80 device of lot number c1655951 involved in this complaint returned for evaluation without the original packaging.The remaining part of the device is implanted in the patient.With the information provided, a physical examination and a document-based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation.The device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the 26th november 2020.During evaluation it was noted that the length of the fractured section returned measured approximately 2cms.Document review prior to distribution ziv6-35-80-10-80 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for ziv6-35-80-10-80 of lot number c1655951 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1655951.There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use (ifu0043-9).Root cause review.A definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to the post dilation balloon not being completed deflated prior to removing it from the stent post dilation.It is possible that if the post-dilation balloon was not completely deflated prior to its removal it may have snagged/got caught on the stent during removal.It is possible that this resulted in the stent fracturing and being removed with the balloon.Summary.The complaint is confirmed as the failure was verified in the laboratory according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|