• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK 3SUT W/OC; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, NON-BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK 3SUT W/OC; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, NON-BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 222304
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the sales rep that during a rotator cuff repair procedure on an unknown date, it was observed that the driver tip on the end of the anchor inserter of a healix advance peek w/ triple strand orthocord broke off inside the anchor and was implanted into the patient.The physician stated that the patient was complaining of significant pain.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: additional information: b5: subsequent follow-up with the customer, additional information was received.It was reported that fragments were generated but were not removed.It was unknown that a fragment existed until post op x-ray.It was reported that there was no additional surgery planned for removal of the broken driver tip as of yet but the patient is complaining of excessive pain.It was reported that there have not been any additional medical/surgical interventions been performed (x-rays, medications, etc.).It was reported that the broken tip suspected to be cause of the patients pain cannot be ruled out.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that during a rotator cuff repair the driver tip on the end of the anchor inserter of a healix advance peek w/ triple strand broke off inside the anchor and was implanted into the patient.The physician stated that the patient is complaining of significant pain.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, showed an x-ray radiography where appeared to have the tip of the healix driver tubing inside the body.The photo did not showed the condition of the device.Based on the information and the evidence, this complaint can be confirmed.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to discern a specific root cause.From historical investigation, this failure was reviewed and the result indicates that the shaft and the tip have a connection point and it is probable that this type of failure can related to a welding issue; when applying excessive tension or with off axis insertion affecting the connection point, it was possible may not have noticed that it broke during the procedure; however, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.Given that no lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE PEEK 3SUT W/OC
Common Device Name
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, NON-BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key10941491
Report Number1221934-2020-03714
Device Sequence Number11573427
Product Code HWC
UDI-Device Identifier10886705021406
UDI-Public10886705021406
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120449
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number222304
Device Catalogue Number222304
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/17/2020
01/08/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/03/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/23/2020
01/08/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
-
-