|
H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed the device was not returned with original packaging.The anchor does have debris on it.Anchor parts are still on tip of shaft.All but two anchor threads have separated from the anchor all that remains are two pieces on each side of the shaft of device.No other physical damage is visible to the device.A functional evaluation of the returned device found that mechanical portion of the device does work.Device passed all functional tests.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated event.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate a review of the material found there are requirements for conformance and a certificate of material analysis is required based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection it was determined that additional material testing is not required.Conclusion: without the requested clinical information or the device the root cause of the implant breakage cannot be determined.However, we cannot rule out a procedural vs user error as the likely root cause of the reported event.The retained piece of the broken anchor is implantable; however, we cannot rule out the possibility of local tissue irritation, micro-motion/and or migration of the retained broken anchor.The ifu for healicoil warns: the use of excessive force during insertion can cause failure of the suture anchor or insertion device.Per communications, a backup device was available, there was no significant delay or other complications reported.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.It was determined the device did not contribute to the reported event.The complaint was confirmed.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|