|
As initially reported, upon removing the device from the package for an unknown procedure, an safe-t-j amplatz extra-stiff support wire guide was bent at the tip.The device did not make patient contact, and another device was used for the procedure.The device was stored correctly, per the reporter.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device on 03dec2020, the mandril was found to be protruding from the wire guide.No adverse effects have been reported.The device was not used.
|
|
Summary of event: as initially reported, upon removing the device from the package for an unknown procedure, a safe-t-j amplatz extra-stiff support wire guide was bent at the tip.The device did not make patient contact, and another device was used for the procedure.The device was stored correctly, per the reporter.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device on 03dec2020, the mandril was found to be protruding from the wire guide.No adverse effects have been reported.The device was not used.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.Evaluation of the device confirmed the inner wire was exposed and a bend was noted.No additional damage was noted.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.One relevant non-conformance was found; however, all affected units were scrapped and there are 100% inspections in place for the reported non-conformance.No additional complaints have been received for the lot.From the information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, dhf, and returned device, cook concluded that the device was manufactured to specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in-house or out in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that transport/storage of the device contributed to the failure mode.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|