|
Patient weight: asked but unavailable.Other relevant history, including preexisting medical conditions: asked but unavailable.Concomitant medical products and therapy dates: asked but unavailable.According to the gore(r) excluder(r) aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), potential device or procedure-related adverse events that may occur and/ or require intervention include, but are not limited to, endoleak and aneurysm enlargement.
|
|
On (b)(6) 2012 the patient underwent endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using gore(r) excluder(r) aaa endoprostheses.The patient tolerated the procedure.On an unknown date, it was reported that the aneurysm was enlarged (amount unknown).Based on imaging (modality unknown) it was considered that the distal end of the contralateral leg component, implanted as a distal extension of the ipsilateral leg on the patient's right side, lost apposition to the right common iliac artery.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a thoracic endovascular procedure to treat a distal arch aneurysm.At that time, re-intervention for the contralateral leg component was also performed.The patient's right internal iliac artery was embolized, and an additional contralateral leg component was implanted distal to the previously implanted device.The physician reportedly noted that, prior to the re-intervention, there was no apparent endoleak, but it was considered that the right leg was not apposed to the vessel wall.It was also noted that the sealing length of both the proximal neck and the left leg of the endoprosthesis had become shorter due to aneurysm enlargement.It was noted that open conversion may be required if aneurysm enlargement continues.The procedure was completed.The patient tolerated the procedure.
|