• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G12664
Medical Device Problem Code Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/30/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Customer name and address= phone: (b)(6).Pma/510(k) number = pre-amendment.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, prior to patient contact during a "tase" procedure, a hole or separation was noted between the performer introducer sheath and hub.As the user attempted to insert the dilator, it did not enter the lumen of the sheath, but rather came out between the hub and sheath material.The device did not make contact with the patient, and another device was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
No new patient or event information to report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Description of event: as reported, prior to patient contact during a "tase" procedure, a hole or separation was noted between the performer introducer sheath and hub.As the user attempted to insert the dilator, it did not enter the lumen of the sheath, but rather came out between the hub and sheath material.The device did not make contact with the patient, and another device was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.Investigation ¿ evaluation a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawings, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The complainant returned (b)(4).Prior to use to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed: one prior to use sheath and dilator were returned.Dilator was partially inserted through sheath.Half of dilator exited the junction between connector cap and sheath.Proximal fitting was disassembled, and the flare was malformed with half of it missing.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied "upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." a review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.Based on the provided evidence and the completed investigation, cook has concluded device failure contributed to this incident.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFORMER INTRODUCER
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key10975463
Report Number1820334-2020-02264
Device Sequence Number16941332
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002126640
UDI-Public(01)00827002126640(17)230612(10)13199785
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source distributor,foreign,other
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/12/2023
Device Model NumberG12664
Device Catalogue NumberRCFN-4.0-18-MPIS-NT
Device Lot Number13199785
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/31/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/01/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/27/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/17/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age2 YR
Patient Weight11
-
-