• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97725
Medical Device Problem Codes Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Impedance Problem (2950)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/16/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 977a260; serial#: (b)(4); product type: lead.Product id: 97725; serial#: (b)(4); product type: external neurostimulator.Product id 977a260; serial#: (b)(4); product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 977a260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 15-sep-2024, udi#: (b)(4); product id: 977a260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 08-jun-2024, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
During a trial, two different trial leads were used with two different wireless external neurostimulators and they could not get the connectivity check to show all green.At most, they got 4 green connections.They pulled the initial lead and put in the new one and it was displaying the same 4 contacts as compromised; however, the manufacturer representative wasn't doing a quad lead configuration.They tried both leads with both wireless external neurostimulators and both ports on the wireless external neurostimulators.They ran an electrode impedance check and they were seeing "do not use" for most of the contacts.
 
Event or Problem Description
The rep reported on january 5, 2020 that a total of 3 leads and 2 wens were associated with this trial.The first wens and 1st lead used that had connectivity issues intra-op were the devices that were returned for analysis.During the trial, the patient had used the 2nd wens that was not returned along with 2 leads.When the patient went to post-op, the connectivity and impedances were checked again and were found to be resolved.The patient continued on with the trial, which went well.The wens and two leads that were used during the trial were not returned to the rep, so they weren't sent back for analysis.The rep stated either they were discarded or were still in the possession of the hospital.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 977a260 lot# serial# (b)(6) implanted: explanted: product type lead product id 977a260 lot# serial# unknown implanted: explanted: product type lead product id 97725 lot# serial# nlj363765n implanted: explanted: product type external neurostimulator product id 977a260 lot# serial# va27klp036 implanted: explanted: product type lead medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of the 97725 serial# (b)(6) found no anomaly.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product type lead product id 977a260 lot# serial# unknown implanted: explanted: h3.The returned device was subjected to a series of standard tests that include but is not limited to visual inspection and electrical testing.The returned device passed all testing in the laboratory and no anomalies were identified.H6.Evaluation result code 3233 does not apply.Evaluation method code 4118 does not apply.Evaluation conclusion code 11 does not apply.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Common Device Name
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
MDR Report Key10977184
Report Number2182207-2020-01433
Device Sequence Number17208085
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000258115
UDI-Public00763000258115
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P840001
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/05/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/09/2022
Device Model Number97725
Device Catalogue Number97725
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/04/2021
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/16/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/05/2021
02/17/2021
03/04/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/05/2021
02/19/2021
03/07/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
Patient Weight100
-
-