• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bruise/Contusion (1754); Burn(s) (1757); Inflammation (1932); Burning Sensation (2146)
Event Date 09/02/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 97755, serial#: (b)(4), product type: recharger.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 97755, serial/lot #: (b)(4), udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who is implanted with an implantable neurostimulator for spinal pain.The patient reported that about 2 months ago when he was charging his back, he was feeling a burning at the ins site and noticed discoloring of the skin around the ins site like "bruising" as a result of the burning.He stated this happened since almost the beginning of implant (b)(6) 2020 but was getting worst with time.He has been talking with his health care provider (hcp) about this issue and have not been treated medically for the burning/discoloration.No circumstances led to the event per patient.A replacement recharger antenna (rtm) was sent to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(6) product type recharger.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the replacement device did not resolve the burning around the ins site area.It was still discoloring, not hot but warm.No further actions were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: the recharger, s/n (b)(6) was return for product analysis.Analysis of the device found the recharge antenna complaint unverified.The rtm never got hot after running for 10 minutes.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The pt notes having warmth over the ins site, agitation, and discoloration/bruising on the skin as a result of charging.The caller states the recharger (rtm) was replaced and the pt, who is with the rep today, notes that the new rtm helped for 4-5 months but the issue persists.The pt has turned the heat/speed down.Caller notes the ins is a little superficial.Technical services (tss) suggested they replace rtm again but advised the rep to consider the ins/pocket itself and perhaps having less pressure on ins when charging.A replacement recharger (rtm) was sent out to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key10977263
MDR Text Key220484367
Report Number3004209178-2020-21493
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2021
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/09/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/04/2021
03/08/2021
06/08/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/11/2021
03/09/2021
06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/07/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight91 KG
-
-