|
A product investigation was conducted.Visual investigation: the received devices are in an desolate condition.Especially the surface of the instruments are worn and deformed from frequent using as well as the bore are worn and deformed.Investigation conclusion: after a visual inspection, it is determined that the reusable instrument is worn from repeated use and servicing; therefore, further investigation for the reported complaint device is not required.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition; therefore, further corrective and/or preventive action is not required.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.End of life definition per important information leaflet se_023827_am, limits on reprocessing: end of life of a device is normally determined by wear and damage due to use.Evidence of damage and wear on a device may include but is not limited to corrosion (i.E.Rust, pitting), discoloration, excessive scratches, flaking, wear and cracks.Improperly functioning devices, devices with unrecognizable markings, missing or removed (buffed off) part numbers, damaged and excessively worn devices should not be used.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is appropriate.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part # 03.111.024, lot # 2680036, manufacturing site: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: 11.Feb.2011.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance's were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|