• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN; ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN; ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER Back to Search Results
Model Number 228143
Device Problem Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 11/24/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during a knee arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2020, it was observed that the meniscal deployment gun device was showing resistance on its trigger when the first implant was fired even though the needle was properly inserted.The first implant was placed in the meniscus without a hitch despite the resistance of the gun.When the red trigger was pressed to slide the second implant towards the tip of the needle the gun resisted, fired the second implant with the gray trigger, and the second implant jammed along with the trigger.This did not allow the second implant to enter the meniscus and remain floating in the intra-articular space.The surgeon cut the remaining suture and removed it from the joint, cut the suture from the second implant and reached for it to remove it.However, he was unable to retrieve the fired implant.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary =according to the information provided, it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 during knee arthroscopy surgery with meniscal repair; omnispan' s pistol failed.The needle was properly inserted by our technician.At the time the dr.Fired the first implant he reported to us that the gun was showing resistance on the trigger.He proceeded to place the first omnispan implant in the meniscus without a hitch despite the resistance of the gun.When the red trigger was pressed to slide the second implant towards the tip of the needle the gun resisted, fired the second implant with the gray trigger, and the second implant jammed along with the trigger.This did not allow the second implant to enter the meniscus and remain floating in the intra-articular space.The dr.Cut the remaining suture and removed it from the joint, cut the suture from the second implant and reached for it to remove it; however, he was unable to retrieve the fired implant.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, 4 photos were provided.Upon visual inspection of the photos, the exterior of both sides of the device are visible, no structural anomalies could be observed, the distal tip of the shaft is visible, the slider and the lever deployment rods could be observed, no structural damages are visible.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The event described could not be confirmed as the photos provided can only provide the exterior appearance of the device.Hands on the device would provide an accurate analysis outcome.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN
Type of Device
ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key11013244
MDR Text Key225336021
Report Number1221934-2020-03876
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEF
UDI-Device Identifier10886705010059
UDI-Public10886705010059
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number228143
Device Catalogue Number228143
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/17/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-