| Model Number |
M00545820 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
11/18/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Healthcare professional that completed the initial complaint form to the competent authority: (b)(6), pharmacist.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the problem analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a tandem rapid exchange cannula device was used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed in the pancreatic duct (channel of wirsung) on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, it was noticed that the radiopaque (ro) marker was detached inside the patient.There is no information if an attempt was made to retrieve the detached ro marker.The procedure was completed with a second tandem rapid exchange cannula.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a tandem rapid exchange cannula device was used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed in the pancreatic duct (channel of wirsung) on (b)(6), 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, it was noticed that the radiopaque (ro) marker was detached inside the patient.There is no information if an attempt was made to retrieve the detached ro marker.The procedure was completed with a second tandem rapid exchange cannula.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block e1: healthcare professional that completed the initial complaint form to the competent authority: (b)(6) block h6 (device codes): the problem code 2907 captures the reportable event of ro marker detached.Block h10: the returned tandem rapid exchange cannula was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the working length was kinked.Additionally, the radiopaque (ro) marker was not present in the device.The device was observed under magnification and the guidewire lumen was completely torn.The tip was also found damaged.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of ro marker band detached was confirmed.A label review was performed, and from the information available, this device was used in a manner inconsistent with the instructions for use (ifu).Upon analysis of the returned device, it was found that the guidewire lumen was completely torn, which is evidence that the guidewire was withdrawn from the catheter incorrectly as the ifu states, "upon completion of peeling the guidewire to biopsy valve, lock the guidewire into locking feature of the rx locking device.Withdraw the cannula from the scope until the distal open channel marker is visible at the rx locking device and resistance is felt.Perform standard exchange procedure over the final 25 cm of the rapid exchange xl cannula.Once the distal blue tip is exposed from the rx locking device, relock the guidewire and pull the rapid exchange xl cannula off the wire".Taking all available information into consideration, the investigation concluded that the reported event and the observed failures were likely due to the user not following the manufacturer's instructions.Therefore, the most probable cause is failure to follow instructions.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.Block h11 (correction): distributor has been added in block g3 (report source).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|