• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G10626
Medical Device Problem Code Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/10/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510k #: preamendment.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, prior to insertion during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure, the tip of a performer introducer was noted to be torn.Access was obtained in the right femoral artery.As the user attempted to insert the complaint device over another manufacturer¿s 0.035-inch wire guide, a tear was found at the tip of the sheath.Resistance was not reported.The device was not used, and another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
G4: pma/510(k) number: k171999.Summary of event: as reported, prior to insertion during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure, the tip of a performer introducer was noted to be torn.Access was obtained in the right femoral artery.As the user attempted to insert the complaint device over another manufacturer¿s 0.035-inch wire guide, a tear was found at the tip of the sheath.Resistance was not reported.The device was not used, and another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned for investigation with biomatter present.The dilator tip was split and peeled back.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.Evidence from the complaint file, device history record, complaint history, manufacturing documents, and device failure analysis suggests that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.The product ifu instructs the user to inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred upon removal from the package.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFORMER INTRODUCER
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key11027271
Report Number1820334-2020-02325
Device Sequence Number18989989
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002106260
UDI-Public(01)00827002106260(17)230623(10)13217542
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,health professional,o
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/23/2023
Device Model NumberG10626
Device Catalogue NumberRCFW-18.0P-38-40-RB
Device Lot Number13217542
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/07/2021
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/11/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/02/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/17/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/11/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-