| Model Number |
1960-50-500 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Local Reaction (2035); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544)
|
| Date of Event |
03/05/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Initial reporter occupation: litigation claim letter.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Patient was revised to address pain and loosening of the femoral component at the bone to cement interface.Depuy cement was used.Sigma femur was exchanged to tc3 femur as well as exchanged rp insert trial to a tc3 rp insert trial and exchanged patella.Doi: (b)(6) 2017.Dor: (b)(6) 2019; right knee.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medical records/billing records were reviewed: on (b)(6) 2018, the patient had a revision right total knee arthroplasty to address loosening tibial tray at the implant/cement interface, pain, effusion, clunking and inability to perform his normal function.The femoral component was noted to be loosened ¿was cleaned and re-cemented¿, the patella was noted to be well fixed and was retained.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address loosening of the tibial tray at the cement/implant interface, pain, swelling, and difficulty with walking.The patella and femoral components were noted to be well-fixed and were retained.The insert was removed without allegation of deficiency.(sticker page 46 of 97) depuy tibial tray and insert were used as well as competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient had a revision right total knee arthroplasty to address loose right total knee.The indications for surgery included that the patient had a previous revision for aseptic loosening of his tibial plateau.The patient now has loosening of the femoral component as well as the patellar component, severe popping and snapping and difficult ambulation.During the procedure, the surgeon observed loosening of the femoral component and patella, with no interface provided.The tibial tray was noted to be well fixed.(sticker page 55 of 97) depuy patella, insert, and femoral components along with competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address failed left total knee arthroplasty and loose left total knee arthroplasty.The indications for surgery included: one bag of depuy cement used for both knees during initial implantation, which led to early failure and has had a previous revision for loose tibial.Prior medical records noted the patient was experiencing instability, and pain.During the current revision the surgeon reported that the femoral component and patella were loose, no interface provided.(sticker page 43 of 97) depuy femoral component, patella, and insert, along with competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medical and billing records received and were reviewed: office notes 03/21/2019 - 12/19/2019 indicate the patient is experiencing swelling, popping, instability and pain of the left knee.He is also experiencing swelling, pain, numbness and instability in the right knee and feelings of crunching and cracking.Current treatment includes oral pain medication, physical therapy, knee braces and nerve blocks.No evidence of additional revision of products.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: patient product x-ray images have been provided for review (alert dates: (b)(6) 21, (b)(6) 21 and (b)(6) 21.No device associated with this report was received for examination.Provided images in jpeg format within patient medical records.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|