| Model Number |
1960-40-500 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
03/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Occupation: litigation claim letter.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was revised to address loosening of the femoral component at bone to cement interface.Unknown cement was used.It was also reported that there was painful hardware, the surgeon removed femur/tibial insert/patella.Original date of surgery was unknown as it was performed at another hospital.I do not have part or lot numbers from the explanted implants.This is all the information i can provide.Doi: unknown, dor: (b)(6) 2019, left knee.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: e3 initial reporter occupation: lawyer.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address loosening of the tibial tray at the cement/implant interface, pain, swelling, and difficulty with walking.The patella and femoral components were noted to be well-fixed and were retained.The insert was removed without allegation of deficiency.Depuy tibial tray and insert were used as well as competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address failed left total knee arthroplasty and loose left total knee arthroplasty.The indications for surgery included: one bag of depuy cement used for both knees during initial implantation, which led to early failure and has had a previous revision for loose tibial.Prior medical records noted the patient was experiencing instability, and pain.During the current revision the surgeon reported that the femoral component and patella were loose, no interface provided.Depuy femoral component, patella, and insert, along with competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : per internal procedures, the event information and any investigational inputs received as part of required follow up were reviewed.For this investigation, no immediate action was required as no alleged deficiency with the device was identified.Monitor ¿ exempt per wi-7915 - known possible complication of joint replacement surgery no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or device history record (dhr) review, was not possible because the required lot code was not provided.The reported event is considered one of the possible complications of joint replacement.The complaint information provided has been reviewed for complaint coding, medical device reporting, and other data required by the complaint system.Follow-up for additional event information, if applicable, was conducted utilizing work instruction wi-7915 appendix a.Without the physical complaint sample associated with this report, it was not possible to determine if the device failed to meet specification at the time it was released for distribution.The device associated with this event was used in the treatment of the patient as prescribed by the presiding surgeon.From the event information received, it was not possible to determine the relationship of the device to the reported event.No product contribution to the reported event was identified.No information received with this individual complaint indicated that a broader investigation or corrective action was necessary.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|