|
It was reported, after completing retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs), when removing the cook® multi-use holmium laser fiber, the blue plastic outer part of the fiber separated from the inner part of it.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary it was reported, after completing retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs), when removing the cook® multi-use holmium laser fiber, the blue plastic outer part of the fiber separated from the inner part of the device.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation - evaluation reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, manufacturing instructions and quality control procedures and a visual inspection and functional test of the device were conducted during the investigation.One open package containing a holmium laser fiber and one sealed laser fiber were returned for investigation.The sealed device was unpacked, and the connector was noted to be intact.There was no damage observed along the laser fiber or deficiency found.The blue jacket appeared intact.Evaluation of the device returned in the open package found that the silicon connector was intact and did not separate when tugging on fitting.Visual examination confirmed separation of the laser fiber from 75cm to 78.2cm.The laser fiber blue jacket was bulged at 79.2cm.No charring was observed.The clear tip of the laser fiber was broken.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and no additional lot-related complaints were received.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.There were no identified gaps in the manufacturing instructions or quality controls procedures.The device is inspected visually and functionally for cracks and fractures by manufacturing and quality control.The instructions for use included with the device caution, ¿a number of different factors affect the life of any particular fiber, including: extended lasing at high power continuous lasing with the fiber tip in contact with tissue poor reprocessing (length of fiber removed in reprocessing should be no less than 2.5 cm) lasing with a contaminated or damaged proximal end improper handling poor laser beam alignment or focus¿ the device ifu additionally contains instructions regarding laser fiber handling, removing, and reprocessing.Based on available evidence, cook has concluded that the most probable cause of laser fiber separation/ breakage is related to improper handling of the device.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|