| Model Number |
7206010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Flaked (1246)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/01/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case- (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during shoulder scope procedure, the full radius blade was not resecting as needed and the blade was rubbing on the outersheath leaving metal shavings behind in the joint.A backup device was available to complete the procedure with no delay or other complications.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during shoulder scope procedure, the full radius blade was not resecting as needed and the blade was rubbing on the outersheath leaving metal shavings behind in the joint.All pieces were removed from patient.A backup device was available to complete the procedure with no delay or other complications.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the inspection process found that each component should be visually inspected for all non-conforming attributes defined in the procedure.Per e-mail communication the metal shavings were removed from patient and a back up device was used to complete the procedure.No patient injuries or adverse consequences were reported.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|