It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient¿s left eye, however five months post-op refraction was -1.25 + 2.00 x 90, and lens was placed at 170.Pre-op astigmatism was 2.06 x 170.Patient is not post-lasik and the iol is in perfect position (no rotation) post-operatively.It was noted that the issue is post-op refractive surprise.There was no anatomy or quality issues.Upon further follow-up, it was confirmed that the iol was later explanted.No other information was provided.
|
Additional information: section d10: device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 1/25/2021.Section h3: device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside a specimen cup, with customer notes.Visual inspection under magnification, revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics.Which is consistent with a lens that was handled, during explant.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed.And no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed, that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed, that no other complaint was received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|