|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that during a rotator cuff repair that the sutures of the 4.75 healix advance knotless peek did not come through while pulling them.The device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it was identified that the threader tab was damaged due to it was bent and the threaded wire was not attached through the distal part of the anchor.The cleats of the ring and the anchor were in good condition; also, the suture card was still in place.Since the condition of the device received, this complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: l918907, and no nonconformances were identified.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for this lot of 300 devices that were released to distribution.No additional information regarding the technique used during the procedure was provided to determine the causes contributed to this event.We cannot discern a specific root cause.It is possible that the threaded wire was damaged when it was reloaded and pushing the wire under a high tension.As per ifu- 116000 it is necessary to keep the sutures at equivalent lengths after passing/ trying.When pull the threader tab, which is attached to the wire until all sutures have been pulled through the anchor, driver collar and out of the slot in the driver.To reload the threader tab, slide the driver collar to the distal end of the slot in the driver push the wire kite through the driver collar, into the slot of the driver.Feed the wire kite until it appears through the distal tip of the anchor.It is important to holding sutures under slight tension.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitkek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|