Catalog Number 07.02001.075 |
Device Problem
Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 12/02/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.The lot number is unknown; therefore the device history records are unable to be reviewed.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.Reference reports 3012447612-2020-00689, 3012447612-2020-00690, 3012447612-2020-00706, and 3012447612-2020-00707.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported there was a revision surgery to address patient pain associated with two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws at l5 discovered five weeks post-op.The surgeon removed the two closure tops and the two corresponding pedicle screws.The surgeon replaced the screws with longer ones and replaced the closure tops.This is report four of four for this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: d4: lot number.Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported there was a revision surgery to address patient pain associated with two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws at l5 discovered five weeks post-op.The surgeon removed the two closure tops and the two corresponding pedicle screws.The surgeon replaced the screws with longer ones and replaced the closure tops.This is report four of four for this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information and initially corrected information.Summary: the complaint is confirmed for both returned screw for not retaining the closure top post op, one of them is also confirmed to have damage on the tulip threads.No medical records were provided with the complaint.Inspection: the specified identity of the devices was confirmed and the devices were examined.Visual inspection revealed thread damage on the tulip threads of one of the returned screws (07.02001.075).There were no indications of damage on the second screw.Photos of x-rays were also provided for review.The x-rays showed that the closure tops have migrated.The complaint is confirmed.Dhr review: the dhrs were reviewed.There are no indications of manufacturing issues which would have contributed to this event and the devices were likely conforming when they left zimmer biomet¿s control.Potential root cause a definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.During inspection of the returned parts it was found that there was thread damage on the tulip threads of one of the returned screws.There were no indications of manufacturing issues with the screw and there was no sign of damage on either of the returned closure tops, so the screw thread damage most likely happened during removal or at some point post-op after the closure top had migrated.A follow-up report will be submitted if new information is received that changes the information provided in this report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported there was a revision surgery to address patient pain associated with two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws at l5 discovered five weeks post-op.The surgeon removed the two closure tops and the two corresponding pedicle screws.The surgeon replaced the screws with longer ones and replaced the closure tops.This is report four of four for this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An independent surgeon in the us reviewed the provided images and believes the cause is related to not having the rod seated/reduced fully down into the tulip of the pedicle screw when the closure top was final tightened because of the degree of the patient's spondylolisthesis, therefore preventing the closure tops from fully tightening in the pedicle screws and allowing for later migration.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported there was a revision surgery to address patient pain associated with two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws at l5 discovered five weeks post-op.The surgeon removed the two closure tops and the two corresponding pedicle screws.The surgeon replaced the screws with longer ones and replaced the closure tops.This is report four of four for this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|