| Model Number |
G56998 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
12/08/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial report section: occupation - non-healthcare professional.Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.Prior to distribution, all captura pro¿ biopsy forceps are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an upper endoscopy procedure, the physician used a cook captura pro biopsy forceps with spike.When they tried to perform the biopsy, the forceps would not close.They had to remove the scope from the patient in order to remove the forceps.They had to cut the forceps out of the scope.The procedure was successfully completed with another device of the same type.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event problem and evaluation codes continued: additional ec method code desc: incomplete device returned (4116) investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The forceps were returned with the cups cut from the sheath.The cups were not returned with the device.The sheath measured at 227.6 cm from the base of the handle to the distal end were the sheath was cut.No other anomalies were detected with the device.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.The device was returned to the supplier.The supplier provided the following: visual evaluation: the device was visually evaluated.No damage to the handle was noted.The sheath was severed at approximately 228 cm distal from the nose cap.The remaining section of the sheath with the cups' assembly was not returned for evaluation.Functional evaluation: due to the damaged device, a comprehensive functional test could not be performed.To simulate opening and closing, the handle, was manipulated and the drive wire extended and retracted as designed.The reported event for "would not close" could not be confirmed.The device history records for process traveler (pt) were reviewed.Pt was manufactured september 2019.There were no relevant defects noted in the manufacturing and/or fqc checklist records.Investigation conclusion: the supplier provided the following: the complaint was not confirmed.As a result of the user cutting the forceps to remove from scope, it was not possible to perform a functional evaluation and the complaint was not confirmed.A review of the device history record did not reveal any anomalies.Prior to distribution, all captura pro¿ biopsy forceps are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|