|
Section d10.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 1/6/2021.Section h3.Device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed, viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics.And that the lens was returned cut in half (but not separated).Which is consistent with a lens, that was handled during explant.Furthermore, fibers were observed on the lens.However, this can be attributed to receiving the lens wrapped in gauze.And therefore, cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed.And no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed, that there was no discrepancy found during the review.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed, that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|