Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately eight years later, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast revealed the filter was tilted within the inferior vena cava with the apex of the filter abutted the left anterolateral wall of the inferior vena cava.Coronal and axial images demonstrate penetration of 2 struts of the filter posteriorly, abutted or penetrated the right paraspinal musculature and right-sided renal vasculature.The patient still had pulmonary embolism while the filter was in place.After one month, the patient presented for filter removal.An access made via right internal jugular vein by ultrasound guidance.Under fluoroscopic guidance a catheter and wire were manipulated into the inferior vena cava.Using a sheath and endobronchial forceps, snare the g2 filter and removed successfully under fluoroscopic guidance and one strut was not retrieved.After six days, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast revealed there appears to be a single retained strut from the patient's filter adjacent to the inferior vena cava along its left lateral aspect.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for alleged filter tilt, perforation of the inferior vena cava, and filter limb detachment.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced pulmonary embolism post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 11/2012).
|