Catalog Number CDC-45703-1A |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/10/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Qn#: (b)(4).Mdr report key#: (b)(4) /mdr text key#: (b)(4).Report number#: mw5098133.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the maude report (mdr report key# (b)(4).Mdr text key# (b)(4).Report number# mw5098133) "during insertion of central line, wire was advanced with resistance, so wire was refracted; during retraction, resistance was felt, and wire was removed with difficulty; a section of the wire remained in the patient; cxr: 15 mm linear foreign body in the left supraclavicular region.Information from the attending physician: he thought the guidewire was sheared by the introducer needle indicating failure of the guidewire's structural integrity; he believed that plaque formation on the vessel created a barrier to entry into the vein causing the guidewire to deflect off the vessel and into the sq tissue; it most likely entered fibrotic tissue that caused resistance when the procedures tried to retract the guidewire".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Qn#b)(4).Mdr report key# 10919190/mdr text key# 218981131.Report number# mw5098133.Complaint verification testing could not be performed as it was reported that the sample is not available for return.Without the device to evaluate the complaint could not be confirmed and the probable cause could not be determined from the available information.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the maude report (mdr report key# 10919190/mdr text key# 218981131/report number# mw5098133) "during insertion of central line, wire was advanced with resistance, so wire was refracted; during retraction, resistance was felt, and wire was removed with difficulty; a section of the wire remained in the patient; cxr: 15 mm linear foreign body in the left supraclavicular region.Information from the attending physician: he thought the guidewire was sheared by the introducer needle indicating failure of the guidewire's structural integrity; he believed that plaque formation on the vessel created a barrier to entry into the vein causing the guidewire to deflect off the vessel and into the sq tissue; it most likely entered fibrotic tissue that caused resistance when the procedures tried to retract the guidewire".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|