|
Catalog Number 0998-UC-3013-55 |
Device Problem
Pressure Problem (3012)
|
Patient Problems
No Patient Involvement (2645); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 12/15/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information has been requested, and we will report accordingly if it becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that prior to use the cs100 intra-aortic balloon pump (iabp) did not show the blood pressure rise.The pressure cable broken, causing the blood pressure signal to not rise.There was no patient involvement, and no adverse event reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated fields: b4, g4, g7, h2, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: h3, h6(evaluation method codes), h10.A getinge field service engineer (fse) evaluated the iabp unit and was able to reproduce the reported issue.It was found that the "pressure cable" was damaged, causing the pressure signal not to be replaced.The fse used a secondary pressure cable to test the iabp, and the iabp worked normally.This spare part must be replaced before the iabp could be used clinically.A quotation was submitted to the customer for approval of the repairs; however, the quotation has not been approved yet, and it is unknown as to when it will be approved.If any pertinent information is received in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that prior to use, the cs100 intra-aortic balloon pump (iabp) did not show the blood pressure rise.The pressure cable broken, causing the blood pressure signal to not rise.There was no patient involvement, and no adverse event reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
N/a.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated fields: b4, g4, g7, h2, h4, h6 (type of investigation), (component codes), (health effect-impact codes), h10.Analysis of production: (3331/213) the device history records review concluded that there were no ncmrs, rework, or deviations documented for the reported lot/serial number.Based on the dhr/lhr review results, it was determined that there is no relation between the manufacturing process and the reported failure.Historical data analysis: (4109/213) the review of the historical data indicates that no other similar complaint was reported for the same lot/serial number and reported failure mode.Trend analysis: (4110/213) the overall 24 month product complaint trend data for the period (jan-2020 through dec-2020 ) was reviewed.There were no triggers identified for the review period.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|