Visual analysis was performed on the returned device and noted a broken filter wire.The improper procedure and separation were unable to be confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no indication to suggest a lot specific product quality issue.The investigation determined that the reported failure to retrieve the filter was due to the circumstances of the procedure.The incident details stated,¿ the physician loaded the nav6 filter on to the non-abbott guide wire.¿ the barewire has a step that prevents the filter from embolism and enables the filter to be retrieved.The step or bump in the barewire for the emboshield is.019¿.The reported information indicated that the non-abbott wire was a viper 17.The viper 17 wire has a.017¿ step or bump.The filter stop id is.015¿.Additionally, the returned filter was found to have a broken wire.In this case, it is likely that the broken filter wire created enough resistive retrieval force that allowed the.017¿ bump of the viper wire to be pulled through the filter allowing its separation.The break in the filter was due to case circumstance.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling.Na.
|