| Model Number |
HOYA 230 (+21.00 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/09/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda as a reportable adverse event that occurred in the usa.Regarding manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending device return and completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6) 2020 : initial complaint reported by distributor indicated: deformed haptic after implantation; intra-operative explant.No incision enlargement or sutures were necessary; product replaced with another lens immediately during surgery; patient health not impacted.04-jan-2020: additional information received from distributor reported: the account has indicated the patient is doing well.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable malfunction that occurred in the usa.The report includes corrected information and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: h3 has been changed from no, in the initial report, to yes.Additional information: the product was returned to the manufacturer, and the investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.The leading haptic was tucked.The trailing haptic was slightly deformed.The optic was broken and separated from the root of the leading haptic.The optic edge was broken and separated.The optic was cracked from the root of the trailing haptic.The slider was completely advanced.The rod contacted to the optic.The nozzle was stretched from the slit.Trace of lubricant was found inside the injector.The dye test result showed the injector tip was properly coated.We could release a re-installed iol from the returned injector without any problems.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no.: (b)(6); model: 230) the exact root cause was not determined.However, from our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.Risk analysis was conducted on the product line and failure code is noted below.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
16-dec-2020: initial complaint reported by distributor indicated: deformed haptic after implantation; intra-operative explant.No incision enlargement or sutures were necessary; product replaced with another lens immediately during surgery; patient health not impacted (b)(6) 2020: additional information received from distributor reported: the account has indicated the patient is doing well.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|