| Model Number |
PD24127K |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Embolism (1829); Muscle Spasm(s) (1966)
|
| Date of Event |
01/05/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturers policy.Attempts to obtain patient information are unsuccessful.Attempts to obtain the patient information were made via email.All reasonably known patient information is included in this report.Device is not serialized.The implant or explant dates are not applicable to this device.Concomitant medical products: phoenix guidewire device not returned to manufacturer for analysis.Recall & correctional/removal number: do not apply to this submission.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
There is no allegation the manufacturers device malfunctioned.It was reported during a planned therapeutic peripheral procedure, the manufacturers device successfully debulked the desired lesion.Resistance was experienced, the manufacturers atherectomy device and another manufacturers guidewire device were removed together.The manufacturers device was discarded.After removal of the devices x-ray showed the tip of the guidewire remained in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The tip was removed with a microsnare.During tip retrieval a distal embolization occurred and was treated with an aspiration catheter and nitroglycerin.The patient was reported as "fine" at the end of the procedure.Final angiography indicated the lesion was well treated and distal blood circulation was "fine".Lesion: calcified lesion from the proximal sfa up to the p2 segment.This adverse event is being submitted because the manufactures device is a concomitant device in use when another manufactures device separated in a patient.There is no allegation the manufacturers device malfunctioned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|